Home  /  Services

B2B SaaS link building services, and which of them you actually need

Nine services, specified rather than described — input, output, lead time and the market reference for each. Most engagements use three. Filter by what the audit found and the list shortens to the ones that apply to you.

The audit found:

SPEC-01

The link opportunity audit

Where every engagement starts

The gap is realThe page is the problemThe list is smallThe profile is messy

Eleven days, four passes, one written document. It measures the referring-domain gap at page level, reads the page you need to move against the four outranking it, builds the reachable publication list for your category, and turns all of that into months and budget.

It is the only service on this page you can buy on its own, and roughly a third of the time it recommends that you buy nothing else. The fee is credited in full against your first retainer month.

Input
Your target URL, head term and Search Console access
Output
Per-URL gap table, marked-up page read, target list, month-by-month plan
Lead time
11 working days from kick-off
Fee
$2,400 one-off, credited against the first retainer month
SPEC-02

Editorial acquisition

The load-bearing service

The gap is real

Manual outreach to a named editor at a publication with a verifiable readership in your category. One pitch, one angle, written to their beat. Our writers produce the draft; your nominated approver signs it before submission; the link sits inside the argument rather than in a bio line.

Candidates pass through the scoring engine before any email is sent. Roughly 68% fail, and each failure is written to the rejection log with a reason code that appears in your monthly report.

In B2B the publication list is wider than most teams expect, because a buying committee of five to eleven people does not share a reading list. We map the list per persona rather than per company.

Input
Gap list plus persona reading-list mapping
Tolerance
≥1,000 verified organic sessions/month; topical overlap ≥0.60
Output
6–20 verified contextual placements per month
Lead time
21–40 days, pitch to live URL
Market reference
Guest placements average $220–$609 industry-wide in 2026
SPEC-03

Contextual link insertion

Faster to register, capped by policy

The gap is real

Placement inside an article that is already indexed and already receives traffic. Because the host page carries existing authority and crawl frequency, insertions tend to register faster than a fresh contributed post.

We only buy where the surrounding paragraph makes the link genuinely useful, and we cap insertions at roughly 35% of monthly volume. A profile built mainly of edits reads exactly like a profile built mainly of edits, and the pattern is not subtle at scale.

Pre-check
Host page must already rank and receive verifiable traffic
Output
3–8 per month, blended into the editorial programme
Lead time
7–18 days
Policy cap
≤35% of monthly volume
Market reference
Insertions average ≈$141 industry-wide
SPEC-04

Digital PR & original data

The service that produces links outreach cannot buy

The gap is realThe list is small

Your product telemetry contains a number your industry argues about without evidence. We find it, verify it, publish it with a stated methodology, and take it to the journalists and analysts covering your category.

Where usable internal data does not exist, we design and run a panel survey instead — typically 300+ qualified respondents, which is roughly the threshold at which trade press treats a finding as citable rather than promotional.

The economics differ from outreach in a way worth understanding: higher cost up front, then continued accrual for eight to fourteen months with no further spend. On a twelve-month view it is usually the highest-return line item in the programme.

Input
Anonymised product data, or budget for a 300+ respondent panel
Cadence
One story per quarter on mid-market and enterprise tiers
Lead time
5–7 weeks from data access to launch
Output
Report page, press kit, pitch list, coverage log
Half-life
Earned links continue accruing 8–14 months post-launch
SPEC-05

Expert commentary sourcing

Low cost, high variance, increasingly worth it

The list is small

Journalists on deadline need a quotable specialist. We put your people in front of those requests, brief them, and handle follow-up. Sometimes the output is a link; frequently it is an unlinked mention with your company named as the source.

We log the unlinked ones regardless. Answer engines draw disproportionately on a shortlist of publications they treat as reliable, and being named in that set raises the probability that a model mentions your product when asked to compare the category. No PageRank changes hands and the effect is still real.

The binding constraint is response time, not budget. If nobody internally can reply within four hours, this service quietly stops producing.

Requires
A named internal expert with four-hour response capability
Output
Typically 2–6 placements per month once established
Lead time
Days, when it lands
Secondary output
Unlinked mentions, tracked separately in your sheet
Not for you if
Every external statement requires multi-day legal review
SPEC-06

Category & comparison placement

Produces pipeline independently of rankings

The page is the problemThe list is small

The B2B SaaS-specific service. Getting your product listed — accurately, and high on the page — in "best tools for", "top alternatives to", integration directories and review round-ups. These are the pages a buying committee opens between recognising a problem and building a shortlist.

Half the work is inclusion. The other half is correction: stale listings that describe a version of your product from two years ago, wrong pricing, missing integrations. That second half is unglamorous and frequently the fastest measurable win in the programme.

It is also the one service here whose output is not a ranking. A listing read by twenty thousand operations managers produces demo requests directly.

Audit scope
60–200 round-ups mapped per category
Actions
Inclusion outreach, listing correction, position improvement, new round-up seeding
Market reference
Paid inclusion typically $350–$750 per round-up
Disclosure
Every paid placement labelled in your sheet
Measured on
Referral demo requests, reported separately from rank
SPEC-07

Linkable asset engineering

Built against measured demand, not a brainstorm

The page is the problemThe list is small

Benchmarks, calculators, free micro-tools, glossaries, templates. The difference between an asset that earns links and one that does not is almost never build quality — it is whether anything comparable in your category already gets cited.

So we start from evidence: find the assets your category already links to, count the citations and their sources, and build the version that is missing. Where nothing comparable earns links, we say so and redirect the budget.

The asset stays on your domain and keeps working after the engagement ends. For companies at the lower end of the budget range it is frequently the single strongest lever available.

Selection
Modelled on existing citation patterns in your category
Cadence
One per quarter on the enterprise tier
Includes
Concept, build, copy, on-page structure, launch outreach
Lead time
3–10 weeks depending on complexity
Ownership
Yours, permanently
SPEC-08

Profile hygiene & remediation

Inspect the existing load before adding to it

The profile is messy

Most B2B SaaS companies arriving here carry three or four years of previous agency work. Before we add anything, every referring domain is classified, footprints are clustered by host, template and outbound pattern, and the anchor distribution is mapped against where it should be.

The output is a removal list, a disavow file and a rebalancing plan. On roughly one engagement in five, the correct recommendation for the first quarter is to acquire nothing and clean up instead.

That is an uncomfortable invoice to send, and we send it, because acquisition stacked on a damaged profile buys you a defended position rather than an improved one.

Audit
Full referring-domain classification, footprint clustering, anchor mapping
Deliverable
Removal request list, disavow file, rebalancing plan
Duration
2–4 weeks for audit; one quarter if remediation is required
Included in
Every tier, run before acquisition begins
Standalone
Available as a one-off, no retainer required
SPEC-09

Anchor modelling & load monitoring

The part nobody sells and every profile needs

The profile is messy

Before the first pitch leaves, we model what your anchor distribution should look like at month twelve — branded and naked-URL anchors carrying the majority, partial-match filling the middle, exact-match kept deliberately scarce. Then we report against that model monthly.

The alternative is twelve individually reasonable decisions that add up to a profile reading like a keyword list. Nobody chooses that outcome; plenty of companies arrive at it.

Monitoring runs continuously alongside. Every delivered URL is recrawled weekly for twelve months; removals, no-follow flips, de-indexations and 404s are flagged within seven days and replaced at no cost.

Modelling
Twelve-month distribution agreed in writing at kickoff
Monitoring
Weekly automated recrawl of every delivered placement
Alert window
Breakage flagged within 7 days
Warranty
Free replacement for 12 months from publication
Reporting
Live sheet, permanently open, plus a monthly written review

Rates

Published, not extracted over three calls

Programmes run $3,400 to $16,000+ per month depending on which of the nine services are in play. The full specification and the 2026 market data to calibrate it against are on the front page.

See the rates→ Request a survey